nirmal trivedi - dungarpur,rajasthan
Name: nirmal trivedi
Comments: mera naam nirmal trivedi hai.date05/may/2009 ko mere sasural walo ne muj par 498a ka case kar diya lag-hag 3 sal se unhone meri biwi ko unke gar par hi rakha he.me mumbai me hu yaha computer marketing ka kam karta hu.meri biwi hai 25 year lekin dimag 12 ki ladaki jitana hai.mere sasur use mere sath is liye nahi rakha ta hai ki me kahi uska medical karwa ke pagal goshit karke talak le lunga.mene kaha ki esa kuchh nahi karunga meri kismat me jo tha wo hua aap bhejo. lekin usne kaha ki tum bombay chhod do or goan me GAR JAMAI bankar raho me yaha kam dilaunga.mene mana kiya to case kiya our police ko paise dekar mere sabhi garwalo ipc307dhara lagwai ki hamne jalake marne ki koshish jab ki F.I.R me likhwaya he ki 5year se meri beti ko leke nahi jata he.police ne 1.5lakh ruye liye our 307 dhara lagai jiski wajah se mere mammi-papa 10 deen our me 45 deen jail me raha.hame police walo ne hi bola ki usne jamanat nahi hone dene ke liye jila court tak judge ko paise diye.police to uske hath ki kathhputali he. wo L.I.C.me d.o he paisa bahut kamata he.uska chacha tahsil me munschi tha to pehchan bhi batut he S.D.M,CITY MAJISTRED sab se uski pechan bhi he local M.L.A ka bhi dar dikha raha he mere perents 80/85years he meri sisters ki sha di hue 20/25 hogaye he feer bhi sab ko fasaya he.hamara jeena haram kar diya he ab bolta he ki tum log chhut gaye ho to tumhare gar me aag laga dunga .or case me jail bhijwaunga police itna paisa kha chuki he ki kuchh bhi kar saki he ham kya kare.wo kehta he ki me tumko saja karwa ke hi rahunga chahe high-court ke judge ko kharidana pade.chahe 25lakh bhi dene pade me tumko chodunga nahi.aap soch sakte hai ki bager kuchha kiye 307 lagwakar 45 days jamanat nahi hone di to wo kitna takatwar he our gawo me police/adalato ki halat aap bhi jante hi honge.ab muje kya karna meri halat bahut buri hai aatm-hatya karne ko ji chahta hai magar mere ma-bap budhe he me kya karu,please meri madad kijiye warna waha ki adalate sabut bhi nahi dekhati.me jail me tha tab maine dekha waha 20se25 bekasur ladke 498a me band hai.akhir kab tak.KYA MUJE INSAF MILEGA
3 comments:
Another classical example of the gross misuse of Dowry Act (498A) is the case of television celebrity, Suhaib Ilyasi. India's Most Wanted television host was in controversy after the dispute over his daughter Aaliya's custody rose soon after Ilyasi's wife Anju committed suicide on January 10, 2000 in Delhi. While his mother–in-law, Rukma Singh wanted custody of the child on the ground that she had the right under Muslim law, Ilyasi had taken the plea that his marriage with Anju was not solemnized as per the Muslim law but had been a civil affair. His sister-in-law Rashmi Singh came from Canada after six months of her sister's death and filed a complaint with the police against Ilyasi, alleging that he used to torture his wife Anju for dowry.
The case took bizarre turn when Anju's brother Prashant Singh and father Prof K P Singh took a diametrically opposite stand and described the allegations against Ilyasi as ``rubbish.'' Prashant told Express Newsline:`whatever my mother and sister Rashmi are stating against Suhaib Ilyasi is a lot of rubbish. There is no truth in their statement or in the charges filed by the police against Suhaib. If you are holding Suhaib responsible for Anju's suicide, then my mother and sister are also to blame, as they unduly interfered in their family matters.
K P Singh, a retired IIT professor, agreed with Prashant. “My wife and daughter are breaking up my family”. Both Anju's father and brother allege that Rukma and Rashmi have given statements against Suhaib as `they wanted custody of baby Aaliya. When Ilyasi delayed that, they put him in trouble.'
Anju's mother Rukma Singh had changed her earlier statement given in January, 2000, in which she had stated that she did not suspect any foul play by Suhaib Ilyasi. However when Ilyasi refused to give custody of his daughter, she change her statement and alleged dowry harassment against Ilyasi.
It has been alleged for long that Dowry Act (498a) in India is being consistently misused by clever women for extortion and blackmailing. The NCRB records suggest that during 2005-2006, 94% of the 498A, 304B cases filed by women or by her relatives were primarily to settle scores.
Section 498A in itself is, however, not meant to deal specifically with dowry -- it is commonly considered to be a 'dowry law' because domestic violence against a wife related to dowry demands is considered to be within the scope of 'cruelty' envisaged by the Section.
Manjusha Mandapati D/O Ram mohan Rao churchpet nidadavole. W.G.Dist AP India. This lady was married my friend and after marriage she never ever care my friend and always oppose anything and always be in phone with her friends.he got to know her real character. she has several stories what she did in her college in vijayawada and after college in hyderabad in simple it's a USED pie. her father is a real bastard he knows everything about her daughter but he feel great for that. after knowing all these things he left his wife. to take revenge on my friend this lady filed false dowry harassment cases on my friend and her family members. be careful with this stupid bleady bitch
I am one of the neo victims and here i got idea to express my pain through this way. In fact our constitution has given the privilege to women through 498A. We marry with our deep traditional rooted mindset of rituals, god, fire etc and setting the expectation that we will live like RAM - SITA and will run family like Aadarsh family. But the law put aside this theory and provided the weapon like 498A on the name of gender discrimination, dowry issue and in fact which contradicts the government’s gender equality theory. The women in the era of “SASS BAHU AUR SAJISH” use to play all nuisances using this weapon.
In my case also the constituent of 498A + Wife desire/Intension + SAAS + Wife’s Sister, brother, father role spoiled my family. Ultimately my wife eloped with her mother and took my daughter away from me too by putting some dirtiest allegation on me. Now they utter only one statement that “I did torture against my wife so they took such action” and they don’t have time to explain the nature of torture what i did against her. Anyway what my wife wanted to achieve she achieved it for her self and interest irrespective to me and my daughter interest or career. It is beyond my capability to understand their intension and their instinct as well.
Now a days the married women getting the instinct by smelling the 498A to have a taste of one marriage/family and if it is not perfect then go for other taste and so on with the proper compensation and all under the legal umbrella of IPC. Who will miss such opportunity in a life!! Very few.
So ultimately the law made the Indian citizen like me helpless nothing i can do for the welfare of my daughter or my family. It is beyond my understanding that who made this law who brought this law which is worst than Ahmadshah Abdali’s regime law.
Anyway this is my take my experience but i must say the law contradicts the advocacy of “Gender Equality”. But who cares about it. The politicians are busy with corruption and Judiciary are busy with exploitation. This is not the perception but reality that such women bribe her to those people who are the accountable for the creating the law, interpreting the law and executing the law. So in that case why we citizen of India should expect right justice for such cases.
I read that it is mandatory to have one year separation even for mutual divorce but it should be less than nine month. Law maker of India should think over it. If these set of people will be able to understand the intensity of impact on husband emotion then definitely we will be moving towards the building of right nation on the foundation of law for all.
Please help me. I don't want ending like today's news of Rajesh Gulaty.
Post a Comment